You are moving through your daily routines, completing chores, answering emails, and navigating your commute, when a sudden, unbidden question strikes. What is the point of it all? For the existentialist, this wave of emptiness is not a sign of a psychological breakdown. It is the moment the human spirit wakes up to its own existence. It is the realization that we have been brought into a world that did not ask our permission to exist and provides no instruction manual for how to live.
Existentialism is a philosophy of radical accountability. It suggests that if the universe is silent and indifferent, then we are the sole architects of our purpose. Rather than seeking out meaning like a hidden treasure, we must forge it like a tool entirely of our own making.
Listen to the episode
If you are ready to take a deep dive into the profound ideas that shape human autonomy, listen to the full discussion here: Meaning, Absurdity, and Existentialism.
The Concept of Thrownness
A central pillar of existential thought is that the universe does not care about our individual plans or our search for meaning. Existentialists argue that we are effectively "thrown" into this world without inherent purpose or a divine roadmap. This state of thrownness can initially feel bleak, but it actually provides humanity with the ultimate blank canvas[4].
When you feel the existential void creeping in at two in the morning, the veil is simply dropping. You are recognizing that you are the one holding the pen. A lack of predefined purpose is not a flaw in the system. It is the very foundation of your radical autonomy. Since there is no script written for you, you are inherently responsible for every action you take, shifting you from a passive participant to an active creator.
Kierkegaard and the Dizziness of Freedom
To understand the roots of this journey, we have to look back to the 19th-century Danish thinker Søren Kierkegaard. He is widely considered the pioneer of existentialism because he shifted philosophical focus from abstract systems to the lived experience of the individual. For Kierkegaard, the defining feature of human life is anxiety, a sensation he famously described as the dizziness of freedom.
Imagine standing close to the edge of a high cliff. You feel a sudden pang of fear, not simply because you might slip, but because you realize you hold the power to jump. That realization of absolute control over your own fate is terrifying. It is the absolute power to change your life trajectory instantly, because nothing externally forces you to maintain your current path[3].
To cope with this dizzying sensation, many people adopt pre-packaged social scripts. They focus on conventional milestones, blend into the crowd, and avoid the responsibility of making authentic choices. However, Kierkegaard proposed taking a leap of faith. This personal leap moves beyond collective expectations and commits to subjective decisions that represent your unique individuality.
Nietzsche, Sartre, and Radical Accountability
While Kierkegaard struggled with religious questions, Friedrich Nietzsche looked at the late 19th century and saw the collapse of traditional moral frameworks, an idea he summarized as the "death of God." Nietzsche realized this void could plunge society into nihilism, or the belief that nothing matters. To prevent this collapse, he proposed the concept of the Übermensch (the overman), who creates their own values in the absence of divine command[2].
This intellectual fire reached its peak in the mid-20th century with Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre declared that existence precedes essence. Think about an object like a letter opener. Someone designed it with a purpose (its essence) before it was manufactured. But humans are different. We appear on the scene first, and only afterward do we define ourselves. This leaves us, in Sartre's phrasing, "condemned to be free." We did not create ourselves, yet we are entirely responsible for our actions.
Sartre warned against the concept of Bad Faith, tracing how we pretend we are not free by saying we have no choice. He used the example of a waiter performing his job with mechanical precision, treating his social role as a biological destiny to avoid the terrifying reality that he could simply walk out the door[1].
Working alongside Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir applied these concepts to social realities. In her book The Ethics of Ambiguity, she demonstrated that our individual meaning is deeply intertwined with the freedom of others. Authenticity requires reclaiming one's agency from the external definitions and "essences" imposed by society.
Camus and Embracing the Absurd
Albert Camus took a slightly different path by focusing on what he called the Absurd. For Camus, the Absurd is the friction generated when our desperate human longing for order meets a stubbornly silent universe. We look to the stars for answers, and they offer nothing[6].
Camus used the ancient Myth of Sisyphus to map out this concept. Sisyphus is condemned to roll a boulder up a mountain, only for it to roll back down the moment it reaches the peak, repeating this cycle forever. On the surface, this represents the ultimate meaningless punishment. But Camus famously declared that "one must imagine Sisyphus happy." Sisyphus accepts the futility without hoping for a heavenly reward. By finding meaning in the sheer struggle of pushing the rock, the act of defiance itself becomes his triumph.
The Existential Toolkit in the Modern Age
How do mid-century philosophies apply to our hyper-connected reality today? We now face a distinctly modern version of Bad Faith. We are bombarded by algorithms that heavily suggest what we should like, buy, and pursue. The "crowd" that Kierkegaard feared is now a global digital entity, making the preservation of a sovereign self harder than ever[5].
In modern psychology, these foundational principles have birthed Existential Therapy. This model views anxiety not as a defect to be cured, but as an inescapable part of being alive. It outlines four "ultimate concerns" that we must take responsibility for navigating:
Freedom Recognizing that our choices are ours alone to make. Isolation Accepting that while we can connect with others, we enter and leave this world as solitary individuals. Meaninglessness Overcoming the dread of an indifferent universe by building our own value systems. Death Using our mortality as an urgent catalyst to live authentically rather than putting off the lives we want to lead.One of the most practical applications of existentialism is shifting your focus from "finding" a passion to "choosing" a commitment. In a world full of infinite options, analysis paralysis is rampant. We wait for a spark to arrive. The existentialist perspective teaches that the spark comes after the commitment. Meaning is not found in a career or a relationship. It is placed there by the daily choice to show up.
Becoming the Author of Your Story
Existentialism rejects the notion of toxic positivity. It argues that while events simply happen, we alone provide the reason and the context. While living without the safety net of destiny requires immense moral courage, the reward is a life crafted strictly on your own terms. As we redefine our traditional pillars of community and stability, the existentialist toolkit anchors us in the here and now.
Remember that meaning is a verb rather than a noun. It is not an object you discover. When you feel overwhelmed by the void, treat that silence as a blank canvas. Stop asking what the meaning of life is, and start deciding how you will construct it today.